The Proficiency Gap

(Was this newsletter forwarded to you? Sign up here.)

Jack Dorsey laid off 4,000 people last week. Not warehouse workers. Not seasonal contractors. Block cut 40% of its white-collar workforce. Engineers, product managers, operations teams, people who had desks and laptops and 401(k)s. The company went from over 10,000 employees to under 6,000 in a single announcement. The stock went up 24%.

Wall Street didn't flinch. It cheered. The market has already priced in what most professionals haven't. Dorsey told shareholders that "intelligence tools have changed what it means to build and run a company," and that "most companies are late." He predicted the majority will reach the same conclusion within a year. He wasn't apologizing. He was filing a market signal.

Block isn't an outlier. Companies attributed 55,000 job cuts to AI in 2025, twelve times the number from two years earlier. Dow cut 4,500. Baker McKenzie cut up to 1,000. Microsoft's AI chief gave white-collar work 18 months before most professional tasks reach human-level AI performance.

Now, you can argue the AI-washing angle. That companies are slapping "AI" on cost cuts they were making anyway. 55% of CEOs who made AI-attributed layoffs already regret it. Fair. But the direction is clear even if the timing is messy. The question has shifted from whether AI changes your job to whether you're changing fast enough to still be in the room when it does.

The tourist trap

Most marketers I talk to use AI the way they use a search engine. Type a question, get an answer, move on. Ask ChatGPT to write an email subject line. Generate a blog outline. Summarize a competitive report. That's what I'd call AI tourism. You visited. You didn't move there.

The marketers pulling away right now are doing something fundamentally different. They're running Claude Code to build internal dashboards that pull live campaign data, format it, and generate weekly client reports. Work that used to take a junior analyst two days. They're using ComfyUI to create production-quality visual assets with custom workflows that would have cost $15,000 from a creative agency. They're building AI agents that monitor ad accounts around the clock and flag anomalies before the morning standup.

ChatGPT is one thing. Claude Code is another. ChatGPT image generation is one thing. ComfyUI is another.

These aren't different points on a spectrum. They're different categories. And the vast majority of marketing professionals are in category one, congratulating themselves for using the chatbot.

Why your track record won't protect you

Every previous technology shift in marketing gave incumbents time. When Google Ads arrived, traditional advertisers had years to adapt. When social media exploded, brands had a long runway to find their voice. When programmatic took over, the transition was gradual enough that most media buyers retrained on the job.

AI is compressing that runway to nearly zero. Knowing when to trust AI and when to protect the moment from it was last month's question. This month's question is more basic: can you operate the tools at all? One person with the right AI stack can now produce what required a team of five 18 months ago. That ratio is compressing every quarter.

The implications for marketing leaders are uncomfortable. You hit your number last year. You were in the president's club. Your CEO loves you. But none of that insulates you from a Board that just watched Block's stock jump 24% on the news that half the workforce is gone. Boards don't care about your 2025 performance review. They care about what the org chart looks like in 2027.

And the data at the junior level tells you where this is headed. Early-career marketing professionals aged 22-25 have already seen a 20% net loss in headcount. Creative roles are cratering. Graphic artists down 33%, writers down 28%, PR specialists down 21%. These aren't projections. These are current numbers.

The pattern is predictable: it starts at the bottom and works up. Junior roles go first. Then the middle layer. Then the executives who never learned to operate without that middle layer discover they've been managing people, not doing the work. The person who can do the work and manage the AI that replaced those people becomes the only one left standing.

The two-speed CMO

Marketing leadership is splitting into two speeds. One group is dedicating real time to learning the power tools. Not the chatbot. The tools that actually multiply output by an order of magnitude. They're blocking calendar time to understand what AI coding assistants make possible, not because they want to become engineers, but because they need to understand what's now achievable without one. They're experimenting with image generation workflows that go well beyond "make me a LinkedIn banner." They understand that the AI tool stack has tiers, and they're investing in tier two.

The other group is still asking ChatGPT to proofread their emails.

Dorsey told TechCrunch he'd "rather get there honestly and on our own terms than be forced into it reactively." That framing applies to individual careers just as much as it applies to companies. You can learn the tools now, voluntarily, while you have leverage. Or you can get the meeting invite six months from now where someone explains that the team is being restructured.

The president's club trophy looks great on the shelf. It doesn't write the next campaign, analyze the next dataset, or build the next workflow. The person who can do all three does.